Same-Sex Marriage Appeals Request SCOTUS Review
By AJ Trager
Originally printed 8/14/2014 (Issue 2233 - Between The Lines News)
NATIONAL - The same week the 6th Circuit Court heard testimony for marriage equality, three different states requested that the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) review federal court appeals, to make a final decision on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage.
In June, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of overturning a same-sex marriage ban for Utah, affecting the other circuit states of Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico and Wyoming. It was released Aug. 5th that the attorneys representing Utah plan to ask SCOTUS to review an appeal of the Utah-based ruling from the Court of Appeals. This will be the last chance for Utah to revive the voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, which was found to violate the U.S. Constitution.
"The harm in waiting is significant, regardless of which side prevails," Utah wrote. "Either thousands of couples are being denied their constitutional right to marry, or millions of voters are being disenfranchised of their fundamental right to retain the definition of marriage that has existed since before the People ratified the United States Constitution."
Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring stated Aug. 5th he would also file a petition with SCOTUS to review the lower court's ruling that stuck down the state's ban on same-sex marriage. Herring has said repeatedly that it is his duty to defend the state's ban, however, he has argued that the ban is in fact discriminatory. The petition was filed Aug. 9th with the high court.
The day after Utah filed, an Oklahoma court clerk filed an appeal for SCOTUS to review the second 10th Circuit Court decision striking down the same-sex marriage ban. The cases from Utah and Oklahoma were considered to be on a parallel track but were decided separately. In both cases, the Circuit Court ruled 2-1 that the state bans violated the 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection under the law.
If states "must recognize all relationships as marriages, their purpose for having a marriage policy in the first place--to recognize and subsidize particular relationships because of the societal interests that they serve--would be eradicated," the petition states.
There has been a string of 35 consecutive legal victories since SCOTUS granted federal recognition of same-sex couples in Windsor v. United States last summer. Twelve rulings have come from state courts, 20 rulings from federal courts and three from federal appellate courts, according to a count maintained by Freedom to Marry.
SCOTUS is on break until the fall, at which point the justices will review Utah's petition and decide if they will hear the case.
In early July, the SCOTUSblog, a respected Supreme Court news and analysis website, offered a prediction over twitter that read "SCOTUS will act on the Utah #ssm petition by late-2014, likely grant it, hear argument in March 2015, and rule (5-4) in June 2015."
- Bishops Scrap Welcome To Gays In Sign Of Split
- Federal Judge Strikes Down Arizona Same-Sex Marriage Ban
- October Surprise At The Supreme Court
- Spirit Day Observed Oct. 16
- Alaska Will Issue Marriage Licenses To Gay Couples
- Bishops Say Gays Have Gifts To Offer Church
- Oklahoma Gay Couples Can Now File For Benefits
- National Coming Out Day 2014
- Supreme Court Denies Seven Appeals In Five States
- New York Soon To Change Gender Options On Birth Certificates
- Supreme Court Rejects Five Gay Marriage Appeals
- MY2024 Declaration Calls For Online Conversation
- 9th Circuit Strikes Bans Adds Five More States
- Revisiting Annual Reminders, Nearly 50 Years Later
- The Financial Penalty Of Being LGBT In America
- Freedom To Marry Launches National TV AD
- Two LGBTQ Trailblazers Receive MacArthur Fellowships Totaling $1.25 Million
- In Apology To Trans Community, HRC Pledges Push For Broad LGBT Bill
- Co-Op Tax & Accounting
- Burton Historical Collection
- Fraser Bicycle & Fitness
- Campus; Student and Alumni Groups
- Central Michigan University - Office of Gay and Lesbian Programs
- Moving Companies
- Two Men And A Truck
- National Organizations
- Human Rights Campaign
- Pet Supplies
- Preuss Pets
- Pet Training
- Camp Bow Wow Brighton
- Plastic Surgery
- Colton Center for Men
- Social/Community Organizations
- Lesbian Lending Library
Enter contests to win great prizes like CDs, DVDs, concert tickets and more
- Q&A: Annie Lennox On Her Legacy, Why Beyonce Is 'Feminist Lite'
- Q&A: Getting To The Core Of Nick Jonas: Abs, Album & That Gay Striptease 'They Made Me Do'
- GOP Hopeful Wants 'Christians' Fleeing MI If Gays Get Civil Rights
- Creep of the Week: Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder
- Q&A: Lisa Kudrow On Judging 'Drag Race' (As Valerie Cherish!) & Gays Being Biologically 'Superhuman'
Sign up to receive our weekly newsletters today!
In a Sept. 27 op-ed in the Detroit News, conservative Republican columnist Nolan Finley raised serious concerns about three Republican candidates running for the state house Nov. 4. Todd Courser of Lapeer, Cindy Gamrat of Plainwell and Gary Glenn of Midland -- all correctly identified by Finley as a "trio (who) seeks tea party tyranny." Nolan describes Glenn and Courser as "extremely anti-gay (who) would turn the Republican Party into a fundamentalist denomination of the Christian Church if given the chance." Finley warned that the trio's narrow views on the Legislature could cripple the government and its ability to work across the aisle to move the state forward. Their agenda also includes killing any expansion of the Elliot-Larsen act to include LGBT protections.View More Pride Source Votes
This Week's Issue
Download or view this week's print issue today!
Sign up to receive our weekly newsletters today!