LGBT Legal Activists Laud Holder Announcement

By Lisa Keen

Keen News Service

LGBT legal activists applauded an announcement by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Friday that the federal government will recognize marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples in Utah despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court put a stay on enforcement of the district court decision that allowed those couples to marry.

"It was the right call," said Mary Bonauto, Civil Rights Project Director of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. "The U.S. is obliged to follow its laws and rules about treating married people alike and these marriages occurred in conformity with law."

Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said the Holder decision was "extremely important for these couples and their families, and means they will have the full protection of all federal benefits."

"The federal government has already stated that it will recognize legally married same-sex couples, regardless of whether their state of residence does so," said Minter. Minter was referring to the announcements following the Supreme Court ruling in June in U.S. v. Windsor, that most federal agencies would recognize marriage licenses obtained by same-sex couples even if the licenses were obtained outside the couples' states of residence.

In his January 10 press release, Attorney General Holder noted that an "administrative step" by the Supreme Court "cast doubt" on the marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples in Utah, adding that Utah Governor Gary Herbert has announced "the state will not recognize these marriages pending additional court action."

"I am confirming today that, for purposes of federal law, these marriages will be recognized as lawful and considered eligible for all relevant federal benefits on the same terms as other same-sex marriages," said Holder. "These families should not be asked to endure uncertainty regarding their status as the litigation unfolds."

"In the days ahead," added Holder, "we will continue to coordinate across the federal government to ensure the timely provision of every federal benefit to which Utah couples and couples throughout the country are entitled - regardless of whether they are in same-sex or opposite-sex marriages. And we will continue to provide additional information as soon as it becomes available."

Camilla Taylor, head of Lambda Legal's Marriage Project, said the Supreme Court's order "merely stayed the further issuance of marriage licenses" and "did not in any way affect the validity of marriage licenses that previously were issued - these licenses were validly issued, and remain valid."

"In fact, even the Utah Attorney General's office itself admits that these marriages may well be valid," said Taylor. "Consequently, DOJ reached the only conclusion it could, given Windsor - that it must respect these marriages for purposes of federal benefits, protections, rights, and responsibilities."

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes issued a statement January 8 saying that he was "unable to reach a legal conclusion as to the ultimate validity of marriage between persons of the same sex who completed their marriage ceremony in Utah between December 20, 2013, and January 6, 2014."

"That question," said Reyes, "remains unanswered and the answer will depend on the result of the appeal process."

On several occasions before, same-sex couples have been able to obtain marriage licenses only to have them declared invalid at a later date. That happened most notably in San Francisco after then Mayor Gavin Newsom directed city clerk in February 2004 to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples even though a state law prohibited them at the time. The California Supreme Court later invalidated those marriages.

But GLAD's Bonauto said Holder's action is "very different than the one in California."

"In that case, the mayor decided to deviate from existing law in California," said Bonauto. "Here," she said, the Supreme Court "has already put the federal government on notice not to discriminate" against same-sex married couples.

"And there are legally married couples in Utah," she said. "It's entirely different."

One organization opposed to same-sex marriage was quick to characterize Holder's move as overreaching executive branch authority.

"The Justice Department's edict today expressly contradicts the determination of Utah's Governor and Attorney General, and represents one of the most significant overreaches of federal authority imaginable," said Brian Brown, head of the National Organization for Marriage.

But other groups were quiet, at least so far.

(c) copyright 2014 by Keen News Service. All rights reserved.

MI Marriage Trial

Michigan Same Sex Couples Demand Respect And Equal Treatment

Michigan Leaders React To Feds Recognition Of Marriages

MI Marriage: Schuette Asks For Full Appeals Court Review

The Stay Delayed Allows 315 Couples To Wed In State

Gay Marriage Defines Schuette's Reelection Campaign

Snyder Says Schuette Going Against Trend

Sixth Circuit Continues Stay

Michigan Marriage Ban Struck Down

Michigan Makes History With First Marriages

Elected Officials, Advocates Petition Schuette To Drop Marriage Aappeal

Pictures from Ingham County - Getting Married

Pictures from Oakland County Clerk's Office - Part 1

Pictures from the Oakland County Clerk's office - Part 2

Pictures from the Oakland County Clerk's Office - Part 3

Pictures from Washtenaw County

White Nationalist Group Files Brief Supporting AG's Appeal In Marriage Ruling

Discredited Witness Part Of Right-Wing Cabal

Schauer Celebrates Overturn Of Michigan Marriage Ban

Equality Michigan Circulating Petition to Drop Appeal

Why Are Governor Rick Snyder and Attorney General Bill Schuette Wasting Michigan Taxpayer Dollars On A Costly Appeal?

Michigan Marriage Ban Co-Author Goes 'Moral'

BTL's Wedding Expo: Like Pride in April

Snyder Says Marriages Invalid

Elected Officials, Advocates Petition Schuette To Drop Marriage Appeal

Request To Remove Stay Based On Process And Substance

Schuette Lies To Satisfy Political Base

DOCUMENTS: The decision, the stay, and more

BREAKING: Holder Asked To Recognize Michigan Marriages

Michigan Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional

BREAKING: Sixth Circuit Court Of Appeals Issues Temporary Stay On Michigan Case

BREAKING: Same-Sex Couples Across Michigan Get Hitched

BREAKING: Judge Friedman Declares Michigan's Same-Sex Marriage Ban Unconstitutional

Judge Could Rule Late Today In Mich. Marriage Ban

Michigan Marriage Trial: And Now We Wait

Editor's Viewpoint: Our Long Journey To Justice

Federal Marriage Case Decisions Outside Michigan In Circuit Court of Appeals

Peers Distance Themselves As Regnerus Takes The Stand

Marriage Supporters, Protestors Brave Cold At Courthouse

Highlights From Michigan Same-Sex Marriage Hearing

Brown Says Schuette Instructed Clerks To Defy Court

Michigan Marriage Equality Trial Begins Second Week

Marriage Equality Trial Opens : Science v. Fear

Michigan Marriage Center Prepares State For The Possibility!

Michigan Marriage Case Begins

A Trial Full of Experts: Incredible and Not So Credible, In Hazel Park Case

like us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on google+