Appeal Vowed In Nevada Same-Sex Marriage Ruling
By Ken Ritter
Originally printed 12/6/2012 (Issue 2049 - Between The Lines News)
LAS VEGAS (AP) -
A federal court challenge to Nevada's ban on same sex marriage has been turned back in U.S. District Court, but proponents vowed Friday to fight on with an argument that a pair of state laws regarding same-sex unions unconstitutionally make gay couples "second-class citizens."
Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund attorney Tara Borelli noted that a Thursday ruling by U.S. District Chief Judge Robert Jones came a day before the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether to take up the gay marriage question, and just weeks after voters approved same-sex marriage in three states and defeated a ban in a fourth.
"We think this decision is not only out of step with where the country is headed, but also completely wrong on the law," Borelli said. She said a challenge will be filed with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
Jones, in Reno, ruled that Nevada has "a legitimate state interest" in maintaining the traditional institution of marriage and that excluding the recognition of same-sex couples is "rationally related to furthering that interest."
The question "is not the wisdom of providing for or recognizing same-sex marriages as a matter of policy," Jones wrote in his 41-page order. Rather, he called it a constitutional question about Nevada's right to prohibit recognition of marriages from other states "if those laws do not conform to Nevada's one-man-one-woman civil marriage institution."
Monte Stewart, lawyer for the Coalition for the Protection of Marriage, a Boise, Idaho-based advocacy group that opposes gay marriage and was involved in the case, declined comment.
Officials with Gov. Brian Sandoval's office, Nevada state attorney general's office and Carson City attorney's office declined to comment.
The Nevada lawsuit, Sevcik v. Sandoval, was filed in April on behalf of eight Nevada couples. It was the first by Lambda Legal to make the direct state marriage equality claim in federal court.
It said the 2002 state constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution by denying same-sex couples in Nevada the same rights, dignity and security that other married couples enjoy.
Borelli said letting domestic partners register their legal status but not marry "brands these loving couples and their children as second-class citizens."
The lawsuit also accused the state of establishing a "selective bar to access to marriage" with a 2009 domestic partnership law that passed over a veto by then-Gov. Jim Gibbons, a Republican. And it maintained that same-sex couples are still discriminated against by hospital officials and police officers who question their relationship status because they aren't legally recognized as spouses.
The case in Nevada followed a four-year legal battle in California over that state's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriages _ one of the questions now on the doorstep of the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices are considering taking up a challenge to part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996.
During a hearing in Las Vegas in May, Jones noted a difference in the California and Nevada cases. The California ballot initiative aimed to kill a law that had been enacted to recognize same-sex marriages, while the Nevada Legislature didn't extend to same-sex couples the same degree of legal protection.
Jones said Thursday he would accept no further arguments in the case. He previously canceled oral arguments that would have been held earlier this month, and he said his ruling based on written filings was enough.
Nevada is one of 31 states that have amended their constitutions to prohibit same-sex marriage.
Voters in Maine, Maryland and Washington approved gay marriage earlier this month, while Minnesota voters defeated a proposal to add a ban on gay marriage to that state's constitution.
- US Reps. And 23 Organizations Urge FCC To End Discriminatory Blocking Of LGBT
- Freedom To Marry Launches National TV AD
- Two LGBTQ Trailblazers Receive MacArthur Fellowships Totaling $1.25 Million
- US Senator Comes Out As Gay
- Supreme Court: Which Case Makes The Best Case For Marriage Equality?
- In Apology To Trans Community, HRC Pledges Push For Broad LGBT Bill
- Ginsburg: 6th Circuit Likely To Determine SCOTUS Urgency
- Couples, Firms Take Sides In Gay Marriage Debate
- Transgender Girl Crowned Homecoming Princess
- New CDC Campaign Encourages HIV Treatment And Maintenance
- Man Wins Fight To Get Same-Sex Union Recognized
- Lisa J. Peterson, PLLC
- Macomb Bike & Fitness
- Event Planners
- Will U Party Event Planning
- Esquire Interiors
- Vital Performance
- Michigan State University Museum
- D.J. Murray Plumbing
- Wedding / Event Planner
- The Wedding Connection
Enter contests to win great prizes like CDs, DVDs, concert tickets and more
- Q&A: Bill Hader Talks Gay Kisses ('Paul Rudd Tastes Like Chicken') & Trans Sketch ('Sorry')
- Q&A: Jennifer Hudson On Lesbian Rumors & Drag Queen Attitude: 'I Don't Care What You Think'
- Q&A: Annie Lennox On Her Legacy, Why Beyonce Is 'Feminist Lite'
- Barbra Streisand's Duet With Gay Son Is Highlight Of New Album
- BREAKING: Is Terri Lynn Land's Family Violating Nonprofit Regulations?
Sign up to receive our weekly newsletters today!
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mark Schauer and running mate Lisa Brown sat down with BTL publishers Jan Stevenson and Susan Horowitz prior to the Michigan Democratic Convention for a wide-ranging conversation about their campaign, what a SchauerBrown administration would be like for the LGBT community and who would be included. They addressed LGBT civil rights, health issues, senior care, marriage equality and how both of them have come to be such vocal allies of the LGBT community. Here is a recap of Schauer's words on these concerns.View More Pride Source Votes
This Week's Issue
Download or view this week's print issue today!
Sign up to receive our weekly newsletters today!